Pages Menu
TwitterRssFacebook
Categories Menu

Most recent articles

Trust reviews to learn which air purifier suits you the best!

Posted on Jan 17, 2016

aircleaner3

Air purifiers are a necessity for those people who suffer from some form of dust allergy or asthma. In fact, with increasing pollution everywhere, our houses aren’t as safe as they used to be. One cannot say with absolute confidence that the air inside their house isn’t contaminated. Inhaling polluted air can give rise to various kinds of health issues and it is only sensible for city-dwellers to install branded air purifiers in their house to keep their family safe and healthy.

What is an air purifier?

Surely in today’s world every one’s acquainted with the idea of an air purifier, but in case you didn’t already know, an air purifier is a device which can remove all sorts of pollution from the air, making the air absolutely fresh for you to breathe in.

They come in the form of small stand-still units which can be easily installed in a corner of the room. To know which brands produce the best air purifiers, one can rely on the general air purifier reviews.

Pros of installing an air purifier

Air purifiers can effectively eradicate all sorts of dust particle which often double-up as an allergen, causing health concerns. It can remove particles like pollens, mold spores, pet dander, dust mite feces, and even smoke particles from the air. So you can finally forget about itchy skin or a running rose, because you’ll never have a dust allergy again as long as you’re inside the house.

Ventspils – All Is Quiet On the Western “Front”

Posted on Jan 9, 2016

When the previous Soviet republic of Latvia joined up with the European Union on May 1, investors and analysts had great expectations that Ventspils, the once premier oil terminal in the Baltics, would once again start handling Russian pipeline oil after a embargo that is 17-month. But, so far, absolutely nothing changed, although Latvian business groups are alive with hopeful rumors of a deal that would bring the pipeline that is double Russia to Ventspils back to life. The pipeline, which a decade ago transported 20 percent of Russia’s entire oil export, has been nevertheless since January 2003, if the pipeline that is russian Transneft cut down the movement in an attempt to force the sale of a stake in the terminal.
ventspili
Minority investors into the oil terminal, Ventspils Nafta, are furious at what they say is management that is bad of company by the controversial mayor of Ventspils, whom they claim is more concerned with his governmental profession than profits. Mayor Aivars Lembergs denies playing any part in running the ongoing company, the ownership of which a newspaper editor in Riga called “shells within shells”. The confusion over who really controls the terminal highlights the issues in bringing the pipeline straight back on line.

In an interview in his town hallway office, Lembergs vigorously defends himself, saying that the accusations are all part of a campaign to split his hold on tight the city that is strategic of residents. All of the same, he testily refuses to answer published fees that his wife and children is available prominently within the maze of offshore companies controlling one of Latvia’s fattest cows which can be corporate Ventspils Nafta, which has, in some years, accounted for as much as 8 percent of Latvia’s GDP. “I have a shares that are few. It’s maybe not important how numerous. The quantity is constantly changing. They are bought by me. They have been sold by me personally,” says Lembergs, calculating that he holds lower than 1 percent associated with company. He insists it is by playing the currency markets shrewdly about $1 mln a year which he has built up business passions that earn him. His official salary as mayor is less than $8,000, something he declares yearly on a government-required disclosure kind that is monetary. “It is just stupidity, this talk of hidden shares. By law, I can be a shareholder. It is really not a crime to be a shareholder. It just isn’t crucial if the mayor has one share or a million shares.”

Who’s Calling the Shots

But James Richard, one of Ventspils Nafta’s most shareholders that are vocal says that Lembergs is, in reality, pulling the strings at the company, one thing he doesn’t expect to alter with Latvia’s membership in the European Union.

“I’ve been beating this drum for five years and I just don’t know very well what goes to occur. Individuals are just getting tired of it,” says Richard, a principal at Firebird Baltic Advisors, a brand new investment that is york-based that holds 0.5 percent of the outstanding share money – a stake valued at $2 mln – of Ventspils Nafta. Richard accuses Lembergs of corruption – “a thing that reflects badly on Ventspils Nafta’s share performance.” In their recent “Baltic Petroleum Transit” report, Richard detailed minority stakeholders’ disappointment in the company’s performance since its 1997 privatization, writing, “Ventspils Nafta abandoned intends to double increase and ability exports, since was planned at privatization. Instead the company has used its money to acquire major media outlets to project political influence.” Richard contrasts the standoff between Ventspils Nafta and Transneft because of the 2002 purchase by the oil that is russian YUKOS of a stake in neighboring Lithuania’s Mazeikiu Nafta pipeline complex. That acquisition helped reintegrate Mazeikiu into the energy network that is russian.

Ventpils Nafta’s value took a plunge when Transneft shut down the way to obtain diesel and oil in early 2003. But now, you can find some indications that are early a rest may be imminent. The press that is russian that Transneft switched down in March an offer to buy 50 percent of Ventspils Nafta, saying the purchase price was too high at $27 mln. Ventspils Nafta wouldn’t normally comment on this, with spokeswoman Gundega Varpa explaining, “Ventspils Nafta is perhaps not associated with the procedure of attempting to sell the company – Ventspils Nafta is a company that is public its shares are part of shareholders, and just the shareholders are in a position to decide to offer or otherwise not to offer unique stocks.”